HFS+ or APFS for networked Time Machine target?
				
Posted: 
Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:56 pm 
				by dabrahams
				So I am setting up a zvol on my pool to act as Time Machine storage for a number of network clients.  I'm using the second method described at 
https://openzfsonosx.org/wiki/Time_Machine_Backups, with one possible exception: it turns out I can format the zvol as either HFS+ or APFS—either one will work as a networked TM target—and I don't know how to choose.  Does anyone have insight into this question?
Thanks in advance,
Dave
 
			 
			
				Re: HFS+ or APFS for networked Time Machine target?
				
Posted: 
Wed Jan 01, 2020 2:30 pm 
				by frank
				My experience with APFS formatted spinning rust? It is slow as molasses.
That's on an external USB3 capable drive -- unfortunately connected to the USB2 port on my MBPro-mid2012 laptop.  While it *could* be the USB2 connection, I actually used the exact same disk and connection when it was formatted as HFS+, and got subjectively far superior performance.
I'm staying away from APFS as much as possible now. YMMV...
			 
			
				Re: HFS+ or APFS for networked Time Machine target?
				
Posted: 
Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:13 am 
				by glessard
				I had the same choice to make last month, and I went with HFS+. The reason is not particularly smart: it seems to me that until APFS becomes the preferred filesystem to host a new Time Machine backup, there is no downside to using HFS+ as a TM host.