grahamperrin wrote:Sorry, I meant the agreements between Apple and people such as Mac Developer Program members.
Yes, I know.
Moderators: jhartley, MSR734, nola
grahamperrin wrote:Sorry, I meant the agreements between Apple and people such as Mac Developer Program members.
ilovezfs wrote:grahamperrin wrote:There are confidentiality agreements so please don't expect too much.
I wonder if this will be the new working theory for why GreenBytes is giving us the silent treatment.
monkeyfoahead wrote:ilovezfs wrote:grahamperrin wrote:There are confidentiality agreements so please don't expect too much.
I wonder if this will be the new working theory for why GreenBytes is giving us the silent treatment.
Implying they ever needed or gave us a reason. They'll just continue to keep us in the dark and not even have the decency to tell us why.
ilovezfs wrote:I meant the working invented theory by the forum users.
monkeyfoahead wrote:ilovezfs wrote:I meant the working invented theory by the forum users.
Haha right. Its kinda sad how many users will try and delude themselves from the awful truth
NakkiNyan wrote:I will think about the experimental version. Unfortunately I have to compile both parts (spl and zfs) and I still don't have Xcode 5 installed. It is best to take this to the chatter on maczfs.org https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgr ... /zfs-macos where they have more than 1 mac and can do the job on a faster setup (internal drive). It literally took 15min to install 1 update after it downloaded.
The kexts don't even load. =(
grahamperrin wrote:At this time I have just one Mavericks-specific bug report with Apple.
fumoboy007 wrote:The kexts don't even load. =(
That's not an aspect of my report.
Apple has the relevant details.
grahamperrin wrote:At this time I have just one Mavericks-specific bug report with Apple.
fumoboy007 wrote:The kexts don't even load. =(
That's not an aspect of my report.
Apple has the relevant details.
Users browsing this forum: ilovezfs and 0 guests